[Xastir-Dev] 1.1.4 Release?

[BobDonnell at arkalmus.com]

Hopefully not 1.1.3.1...

Merry Christmas all!

73, Bob, KD7NM

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xastir-dev-bounces at xastir.org
>[mailto:xastir-dev-bounces at xastir.org]On Behalf Of Curt Mills, WE7U
>Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:28 AM
>To: Jack Twilley
>Cc: Xastir Development; Xastir Users
>Subject: Re: [Xastir-Dev] 1.1.4 Release?
>
>
>On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Jack Twilley wrote:
>
>> What version number are you proposing?  1.1.4?  1.2?
>
>Whatever Chuck likes, Chuck gets (Chuck Byam).
>
>
>> What exactly
>> constitutes a stable release versus a development release?  The Linux
>> scheme is very popular with open source software lately.
>
>Not sure.  I don't think we've discussed this particular topic.
>Doesn't matter much to me as I'm always running latest CVS, but I
>suppose some users might think that even/odd stuff might indicate
>the stable/less stable releases.  In our case so far they don't.
>"stable" releases tend to be much less stable than the current
>development releases due to bug fixes.
>
>
>> I don't yet use this feature.  Once I get GDAL working, then I'll see
>> about choosing maps.
>
>Do I detect that some new stuff is coming?  ;-)
>
>I'm glad somebody's checking into GDAL.  I've had it on my mind for
>many months, but obviously not in the conscious part.
>
>Curt, WE7U.				archer at eskimo.com
>http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
>  Lotto:  A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown
>Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xastir-dev mailing list
>Xastir-dev at xastir.org
>http://krypton.hscs.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev
>