[Xastir] UDP frames

Gerry Creager n5jxs gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Mon Jan 10 11:50:30 EST 2005


The conventional wisdom on the APRS list is that UDP is evil, because 
Bob wants an ack from everyone.  Every time.  Never mind that APRS uses 
UI data to work.

Steve D. has supported him in the past.  I'm still working on him, but 
not real actively.

I expect the next generation of the IS will look more like multicast 
than connected unicast, but that's my opinion.

Would it work?  Sure.  Would it be as "reliable" as the connected 
version?  I suspect that statistically, it would be, but the occasional 
lost packet would be seized on a failure.

gerry

Wes Johnston wrote:
> This is probably a silly question... but some of my best ideas start out
> silly....
> 
> There was talk on the APRS sig last week about hooking up an 802.11b card to an
> amp, and transmitting UDP frames to the local subnet broadcast address.  Can we
> do that with xastir?  Can we rx UDP frames with xastir? I know scott miller was
> talking about using network broadcast of UDP for open trac.... so could it be
> implemented now?
> 
> wes
> _______________________________________________
> Xastir mailing list
> Xastir at xastir.org
> https://lists.xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
> 

-- 
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University	
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020
FAX:  979.847.8578 Pager:  979.228.0173
Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843



More information about the Xastir mailing list