[Xastir] "UP" on QUERIES

[MLHPUB]

Hi all,

Thanks Curt and Tom for explanations about capital letters and the 
perfect compliance with APRS specifications.
I have tried today with Cyril with 30 m Robust-Packet.
Juste a last question about this : if queries from RF interface are 
processed, the same from TCP/IP interface look ignored.
Is that right ?

73 de F4ACU

Matthieu


Le 24/05/2018 à 17:51, Tom Russo a écrit :
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:38:29AM +0200, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <f1mhv at free.fr> flavor, containing:
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> Just to bring an ?? UP ?? on Matthieu???s email ;-)
>>
>> - Missing basic queries sur as ?APRSD , ?APRSP etc???
> Xastir already answers APRSD and APRSP queries.  I use them to force my home
> station to report to me.
>
> But they MUST be upper case, per the spec.  We had a complaint years ago
> from UIView users who said Xastir didn't respond, but it was because they
> were typing in queries by hand and using lower case.  The APRS spec says
> that queries are supposed to be upper case.  It appears that in 2004, Curt
> added code to Xastir to print a notice to STDERR when we receive one that
> has the wrong case, saying "consider telling the sender to follow the spec."
>
> As Curt notes, Xastir does not implement all the queries from the spec, though.
> A quick scan of db.c/process_directed_query shows APRSD, APRSP, APRST and its
> synonym "PING?", and VER.  There's a block of code for each of the other
> queries, but only to recognize them and then ignore them:
>    APRSH
>    APRSM
>    APRSO
>    APRSS
>
>
> In the next function down (as Curt also notes), "process_query", there are
> also non-directed queries we recognize:
>   APRS?
>   IGATE?
>
> and we recognize but ignore "WX?"
>
>
>>> Le 19 mai 2018 ?? 22:55, MLHPUB <mlhpub at free.fr> a ??crit :
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> May I suggest 3 ideas for Xastir after few years of use ?
>>>
>>> 1- Queries
>>> It should be great if Xastir could answer APRS queries (?aprsh or ?aprsd for instance, and others). These are really usefull to test stations capabilities especially on HF (or other bands of course) when propgation is good !
>>>
>>> 2- Message timer
>>> Other stations, digi or igate, are sometimes slow to react facing Xastir which retry a message quickly after the first sent. I noticed this "aggressive" behavior especially with slow links (300bds HF).
>>> Can we imagine an adjustable timer for this parameter ?
>>> Because it looks progressive when retries are growing (APRS specs ?), 3 steps could be possible :
>>> - quite
>>> - normal
>>> - aggressive
>>>
>>> 3- Data and messages views
>>> Data view and messages view are really usefull to monitor trafic but I think date and time informations are missing.
>>> How about add this in a short field for each line on these monitor windows ?
>>>
>>> Sorry if theses ideas are not new but I really think they reflect what is missing for me in this wonderful APRS software.
>>>
>>> Standing by if anyone want to speak about :)
>>>
>>> 73 de F4ACU
>>>
>>> Matthieu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xastir mailing list
>>> Xastir at lists.xastir.org
>>> http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xastir mailing list
>> Xastir at lists.xastir.org
>> http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir