[Xastir] Did the NWS pull a fast one - Shapefile data

Curt Mills curt.we7u at gmail.com
Sat Dec 21 16:28:03 PST 2019


Checked in the first fix.

Looks like the FZ files matched some of the other dbfawk files
earlier, so we never had to create specific dbfawks for them. That's
now changed and I'm adding yet another dbfawk file to match the
current FZ maps. Will check in shortly after testing.

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:15 PM Curt Mills <curt.we7u at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Working on it. I have the 'z' files working now, but the "fz" files
> have the same problem. I don't see any dbfawk files for the "fz" files
> at all.
>
> I'll check in the first fix shortly.
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:10 PM Tom Russo <russo at bogodyn.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 03:45:04PM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <davidf4 at mindspring.com> flavor, containing:
> > > I think that despite the filename being the same, the NWS pulled a fast one
> > > and silently updated the z_10oc19.dbf file.
> >
> > They have done that time and again, which is why there is a proliferation
> > of dbfawks in the config directory (so that people who don't want to update
> > their NWS files constantly don't have their old files made useless when
> > we change the dbfawk to make them work with the new files --- so instead,
> > each time there's a change we just create a new dbfawk and leave the old in
> > place).
> >
> > > I did a git pull today and it pulled in a new get-NWSDATA script so I went
> > > ahead and ran it after a full compile.  It's reporting that there isn't a
> > > dbfawk signature match for that NWS file.
> > >
> > > I took a look at the Wiki but I can't tell which file(s) in the dbfwak
> > > database are used for the z_ files so I'm having trouble rolling my own.
> >
> > The dbfawks associated with the NWS zone shapefiles are "nwsz_*.dbfawk)
> > in the config directory.
> >
> > Copy the latest one, which would be nwsz_ddmmyy13.dbfawk (appears
> > that the zone signature hasn't changed in 6 years --- it used to change
> > more often).  Call it "nwsz_ddmmyy19.dbfawk" and change the "dbfinfo" line
> > to match the signature in the new files (which you can get by using the "testdbfawk" program:
> > testdbfawk -D /usr/local/share/xastir/config -d [your new shapefile name]
> > whose second line of output is the signature, which could be cut and pasted
> > into the "dbfinfo" value.
> >
> > If they haven't changed the actual names of columns, just the ordering, you
> > should be good to go.  If they changed the names, you'll have to change the
> > "dbffields" variable, too, to pick out the two important columns, the zone
> > number and the  name.
> >
> > If that fixes things, then let us know and we can add the new dbfawk to the
> > repo.  Curt just updated get-NWS a couple of weeks ago, and perhaps overlooked
> > this step (since it's been a few years since dbfawks needed updating).
> >
> > --
> > Tom Russo    KM5VY
> > Tijeras, NM
> >
> >  echo "prpv_a'rfg_cnf_har_cvcr" | sed -e 's/_/ /g' | tr [a-m][n-z] [n-z][a-m]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xastir mailing list
> > Xastir at lists.xastir.org
> > http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
>
>
>
> --
> Curt, WE7U        http://xastir.org        http://www.sarguydigital.com



-- 
Curt, WE7U        http://xastir.org        http://www.sarguydigital.com


More information about the Xastir mailing list