[Xastir-dev] Xastir a CPU pig again?

[Brian D Heaton]

Tom,

	Interesting.  I wonder if th 100us vs. 100ms was a typo when the change
was committed? 

	You are also correct, I'm running Gentoo 1.4 (where I didn't ever see
the high CPU usage).  I didn't see it on RH 7.3/9 either. I'm running
now on an unfiltered internet feed.  

	Was there ever a resolution on what was different between BSD and the
various linux distros that were experiencing the symptoms? I recall the
discussion, but don't recall is there was a final isolation of where the
interaction with the OS was causing it.  

			THX/BDH


On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 18:05, Tom Russo wrote:
> I can confirm it is in fact exactly the source of the problem.  I
> changed the 100us delay in interface.c that had been reduced from
> 200ms sometime between 4 Dec and 8 Dec.  In the 25 Dec CVS version
> this is on line 5307.  Setting it to 100ms instead of 100us ended my
> problems.  With that change (and no other) both the 8 Dec and current
> CVS versions of Xastir are back down to taking negligible CPU times.
> 
> Now to figure out if the issue with CVS gdal instead of gdal-1.1.9 is a real
> one, or just a red herring.