[Xastir-Dev] does it make sense to start killing globals?

[Jim Chandler]

I for one would love to see more functions such as getscale(), or better yet xastir2.getscale()... :)

Jim
N0VH

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
"Curt Mills, WE7U" <hacker at tc.fluke.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> 
> > let's pick an example. would it make sense to say, stop using scale_x and
> > scale_y and make them static to one file and use accessor functions to get
> > and set from elsewhere?
> 
> I see some object-oriented stuff peeking out of what you just said.
> Heck yea!
> 
> 
> > the rationale here would be that it would (possibly) make splitting files
> > into client and server later easier.
> 
> Absolutely!
> 
> Data hiding and encapsulating things into modules/objects as much as
> possible is always a good thing.  I highly encourage that sort of
> thing if you have the time/patience to go after that.
> 
> We could certainly use some better structure right about now.
> 
> -- 
> Curt Mills, WE7U                    hacker_NO_SPAM_ at tc.fluke.com
> Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin
> "Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math!"
> "Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates!" -- WE7U
> "The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xastir-dev mailing list
> Xastir-dev at xastir.org
> https://krypton.hscs.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev