[Xastir] PLEASE....Again

[Curt, WE7U]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Curt, WE7U wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, ke4lkq wrote:
>
> > Doing what Curt did I get 3 hours and 48 secs uptime versus 131.48 from TOP =
> > 131/180 = 72.7% cpu usage.   NOT GOOD
>
> Wait a minute.  If it's 131.48 from top, that's 131 seconds, not
> minutes.  You're much better off than you think.  If it read 131:48,
> then you'd have it right.  Feel better?

As another point to consider, with the latest CVS and 1h 18m 50s of
runtime, I get 19:22.50 from top, which eqates to 25.6% CPU.

That's much higher than the long-running Xastir is showing.  It's
possible that either the latest sources are slower at processing.

More profiling is in order.  I'll be off for the next few days so
perhaps I'll tackle some of this again.  I did this a while back and
stopped before I got too far into profiling the map routines.  I had
always wanted to get back to it.  Yea, I know... sick puppy.

--
Curt, WE7U.   APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"