[Xastir] PLEASE....Again

[ke4lkq]

No, I was right it was 131:48  131 minutes and 48 sec. Sorry about the 
notation.

On Wednesday 12 January 2005 16:28, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, ke4lkq wrote:
> > Doing what Curt did I get 3 hours and 48 secs uptime versus 131.48 from
> > TOP = 131/180 = 72.7% cpu usage.   NOT GOOD
>
> Wait a minute.  If it's 131.48 from top, that's 131 seconds, not
> minutes.  You're much better off than you think.  If it read 131:48,
> then you'd have it right.  Feel better?
>
> > Pentium 111  600 mghz
> > 512 meg ram
> > 40 gig hard drive
> > Suse 9.0 Linux
> > XFCE3, no kde junk
> > top reports 514940k mem   489416k used
> >                  504464k swap    1508k used
>
> Just for reference, this system is:
>
> Pentium 4 1.73 GHz or so
> 256MB Memory
> Similarly-sized hard drive
> SuSE 9.0 Linux w/latest patches
> FVWM2 window manager
>
> Mem:    255352k total,   234492k used,    20860k free,    13880k buffers
> Swap:   514040k total,   197996k used,   316044k free,    62104k cached
>
> Three instances of Xastir running as three different users.
>
> So I have more CPU/less memory than you, same OS.
>
> --
> Curt, WE7U.   APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
> "Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
> "Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
> "The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"