[Xastir] Radio frequency question from a simpleton
Gerry Creager
gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Thu Jul 19 18:00:50 EDT 2007
Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, J. Lance Cotton wrote:
>
>> <begin off-topic ranting and blathering>
>
> Oh, I thought you already did! hi hi
>
>
>> There's no possible way that OpenTRAC could interfere with APRS any more
>> than APRS interferes with other APRS operation.
>
> I disagree with that statement, but only slightly. There's no way a
> "properly coded" APRS program would be bothered by OpenTrac. Some
> of the programs might try to decode packets that used a different
> protocol ID than APRS, for instance if they had KISS TNC capability
> they might see TCP/IP packets and OpenTrac packets and try to decode
> them as APRS. The program in this case _should_ filter out anything
> that's not the APRS protocol ID, but some may not.
As I recall, there was approximately one station reporting "problems"
associated with the OpenTrak incident in question. The lack of
reproducibility suggests that the null hypothesis was rejected.
> Your post was on topic BTW. At least as far as I'm concerned.
I certainly don't think it rated a <rant></rant> tag with attribution.
gerry
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
More information about the Xastir
mailing list