[Xastir] Ubuntu-cvsbuild script updated for 10.10

David A Aitcheson david.aitcheson at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 01:05:24 EST 2011


Okay I was able to get it stopped as it was downloading the third
package and before it did any damage to my developement libraries for my
college courses.

It wanted to wipe out 66 packages that are used on a weekly basis for my
college code and hardware developement courses in Alternative Energy.

A lot of them are really weird "how to relate to the windows world"
translators.

What really irked me was that it takes off and goes with no "are you
sure" question after it figures out what it needs to do; so if someone
hits go and walks away it could be a "mess maker" is all that can render
it down to.

It might be best to use on a machine that is only used for XASTIR and
nothing else.

I am a college senior on a five year plan; starting the final year this
month.  At 52 I don't have another 4 years to rebuild everything.

Dave - KB3EFS


On 01/03/2011 08:52 PM, Jason Godfrey wrote:
> The script doesn't look like it deletes any packages, only updates.
> Perhaps some dependancies for your broken programs were updated, and
> updating those programs will fix it. I would have thought the package
> manager would of handled that.
> 
> Really, four years?
> - Jason
> 
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:52 PM, David A Aitcheson
> <david.aitcheson at gmail.com <mailto:david.aitcheson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     ONE HUGE PROBLEM...
> 
>     This script removes WITHOUT WARNING a bunch of things that BROKE a HUGE
>     bunch or other programs for me.
> 
>     Thanks for setting me back four (4) years.
> 
> 
>     On 01/03/2011 02:51 PM, Peter Gamache/KC0TFB wrote:
>     > Good catch!  I've fixed that.
>     >
>     > Prior to yesterday's release, I tried the script on two different
>     systems:
>     > one virgin install of 10.10 and another that was upgraded from
>     10.04 to
>     > 10.10 (without having run the script prior to the upgrade).  It seemed
>     > fine on both systems anyway, but it seems more common-sensical to
>     do it
>     > with the proper release name, as lucid and maverick may diverge on
>     the GIS
>     > repo in the future.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > -PG / KC0TFB
>     >
>     > Tom Russo wrote:
>     >> One quick comment:  Your script adds the PPA for UbuntuGIS, which
>     is a
>     >> good
>     >> thing, but always seems to add the "lucid" version to the apt sources
>     >> list,
>     >> even if it's detected Maverick.
>     >>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Xastir mailing list
>     > Xastir at lists.xastir.org <mailto:Xastir at lists.xastir.org>
>     > http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
>     >
> 
> 
>     --
>     David A Aitcheson
>     david.aitcheson at gmail.com <mailto:david.aitcheson at gmail.com>
>     david.aitcheson on google and skype
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Xastir mailing list
>     Xastir at lists.xastir.org <mailto:Xastir at lists.xastir.org>
>     http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I have learned to use the word 'impossible' with the greatest caution. 
> -- Wernher von Braun
> 



-- 
David A Aitcheson
david.aitcheson at gmail.com
david.aitcheson on google and skype



More information about the Xastir mailing list