[Xastir] interesting shapefile experiment

[Brian Heaton]

Vic,

	Have you tried comparing the list of installed RPMs on each box and
seeing if anything jumps out as possible related? I know there will be a
lot of changes between 9.0/9.1, but for the type of strangeness you are
seeing that is my first thought for tracking it down.

			THX/BDH

PS - you might also try a verfy of the RPMs to see if something has
gotten wonky along the line.



On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 16:52, vic wrote:
> I have found something interesting that occurs during the ./configure process.
> I have 2 boxes with linux installed.
> Box "A" has Mandrake 9.0
> Box "B" has Mandrake 9.1
> I have not ever been able to get shapefiles to work on box "B" after doing a 
> ./configure and make and make install.
> 
> However if I do a ./configure on box "A" and copy all the files to box "B" and 
> do a make and make install, everything works.
> 
> I have set up each box with identical external libs for xastir, namely only 
> shapefile support from the 1.2.9 version, and nothing else. 
> 
> I have removed the bash shell from Mandrake 9.1 and installed the version 
> running on Mandrake 9.0.
> 
> ./configure writes to the screen identical output on each box. Namely 
> shapefile support is available and the rest of the output is line for line 
> and word for word identical on each box.
> 
> Other than running ./configure on 2 different version of OS everything was 
> done identically, including using the same maps, map directories, permissions 
> and running xastir as suid, in all cases.
> 
> I have come to the conclusion that ./configure does something I cannot see.
> 
> Having compiled the executable in each case ( the one that works and the one 
> that does not work) on box "B", with the configure output (I assume config.h, 
> config.status, and config.log,  the only difference) doesn't make sense to 
> me...
> 
> This tells me that the compiler and the external lib's are probably okay,
> something else very subtle is going on.
> 
> Copying config.status from the ./configure result of box "A" to the file 
> structure of box "B" results in a perfectly working executable, so something 
> in config.status is different between to the 2 boxes yet yields a good 
> executable on the box which fails to produce a good config.status.
> 
> Anybody want to suggest where I look for the differences? Should I print out 
> the config.status files of each and look for any differences or should I 
> print out something else.  Will config.log show any differences?  I want to 
> get to the bottom of this, as it may affect other machines as well.
> 
> Map indexing and all of that work perfectly. Just the shapefiles disappear 
> when the indexing is done when running the executable built with the 
> config.status from box "B". They re-appear when the executable is built on 
> this same box "B", using config.status from box "A".
> 
> I would appreciate any suggestions as to where to look next.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Regards, Vic ke4lkq
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xastir mailing list
> Xastir at xastir.org
> https://krypton.hscs.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/xastir
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian D Heaton
Senior Network Engineer
Janus Research Group
(706) 364-9100
PGP Key Available