[Xastir] Stymied...

[Carl Makin]

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Curt Mills, WE7U wrote:

> On Thu, 22 May 2003, Carl Makin wrote:
> 
> > The number is a little bit important if we want to package up the
> > resultant code into a FreeBSD, Fink or DarwinPorts port/package.  They
> > rely on the version number incrementing in a predictable way.
> 
> And incrementing by one isn't a predictable way???

I was actually referring more to the snapshots which have a date rather
than an incrementing version number.  I didn't make that clear, sorry.

> > version number up to 1.2 for this release and then the quarterly
> > releases could be 1.2.x.  That should carry us through until 2.x.x is

> You can make all the suggestions you want, but it's up to the
> project admin if/when/how to release, and he gets to pick the
> revision number.  Whenever Chuck decides that we're ready, a release

I just think that the current Xastir is so considerably improved over the
1.1.0 release that it deserves more than a point increment.


Carl.