[Xastir] Problem under debian "Etch"

Bob Nielsen nielsen at oz.net
Fri Apr 20 21:43:33 EDT 2007


Yeah, various versions of automake can exist simultaneously on Debian  
and the version is in the package name (automake1.8, automake1.9,  
etc.) so they don't get upgraded automatically.

Bob, N7XY

On Apr 20, 2007, at 12:25 PM, William McKeehan wrote:

> I did not examine which version of automake and autoconf that I had  
> installed
> before I upgraded, but I noticed that with moving to etch, one of  
> them was
> automatically upgraded and the other was not, so I upgraded the  
> other so they
> would "match".
>
> Now, I'm running versions:
> automake: 1.10
> autoconf: 2.61
>
> -- 
> William McKeehan
>
> On Fri, April 20, 2007 1:36 pm, Tom Russo wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:28:00AM -0700, we recorded a bogon- 
>> computron
>> collision of the <archer at eskimo.com> flavor, containing:
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have seen this before, it has always been the result of using  
>>>> a version
>>>> of autoconf/automake that is too old.
>>>
>>> You're late to the party, but your info is spot-on.  ;-)
>>
>> That'll learn me to respond to the middle of threads.
>>
>>> FAQ question 4.29 now has this and other debugging info in it for
>>> this exact error plus other missing file/bad config file sorts of
>>> problems.  Add/revise the text there as necessary.
>>
>> The first thing to check in that question should be automake/ 
>> autoconf, the
>> other stuff would be red herrings.  This question has come up  
>> before and
>> the XASTIR_DATA_BASE variable not being properly set in the  
>> makefile is
>> the normal culprit --- we talked about not doing it that way, but  
>> apparently
>> there's something about the GNU coding standard that requires it  
>> to be this
>> way.  Each time it's come up, it has always been automake/autoconf  
>> versions
>> that were to blame.
>>
>> Somewhere in our FAQ we list the minimum versions required. I'm  
>> not sure
>> if those minimum versions are even the right ones anymore.  I'm using
>> autoconf 2.59 and automake 1.9.6 these days and they're fine.  We  
>> might want
>> to do a quick survey of which versions are actually working  
>> properly, and
>> get that codified in the FAQ more explicitly.  Right now it just says
>> autoconf 2.53 or later and automake 1.6.3 or later.  If those  
>> versions
>> still work, great, but if newer versions *don't* work we need to  
>> know that
>> *AND* fix our configure script so it *does* work with newer versions.
>>
>> --
>> Tom Russo    KM5VY   SAR502   DM64ux          http://www.swcp.com/ 
>> ~russo/
>> Tijeras, NM  QRPL#1592 K2#398  SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/ 
>> brain.cgi?DDTNM
>> "And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all  
>> you get is
>>  one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy,  
>> oooh, oooh,
>>  oooh, the sky is the limit!"  --- The Tick
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xastir mailing list
> Xastir at xastir.org
> http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
>




More information about the Xastir mailing list